Notice what you are doing. You are rejecting a moral conclusion, claiming it to be "wrong". What authority are you appealing to in order to make such a pronouncement? Not scripture, not theory, not culture, not evidence - you are merely appealing to your inner moral intuitions, both emotional and rational.
Every time philosophers try to debunk a moral theory, they present outlier situations and try to trigger within you an intuition within you that contradicts the theory.
Its as if we all instinctively know that the bedrock authority for morality is our inner sense of right and wrong, and we test moral theories against that inner sense.
Well - if that inner sense is the ultimate authority, why dont we build our moral theories around that inner sense? We can measure how all people react to a gradient of thoughy experiments. We can get accurate data with brain scans. We can plot their intuitions on a graph. We can measure the neurological intensity of these opinions. Then we can have a complete moral theory that is exactly aligned with our collective inner moral authority.