I've seen multiple critiques of Jordan Peterson, but ideological bias seems to poison the ability of many to do a good faithed critique. Despite being a bit overly harsh on Jordan Peterson (in my opinion), this is probably one of the best critiques of Jordan Peterson I've seen. David has the amazing ability to use an integral bird's eye view of ideology and show exactly where the biases, borders, blind spots, and weaknesses of a person's perspective lie.
David shows himself to not be a fan of Jordan Peterson's "clean your room" rule, because it seems condescending, but I have found great value in this principle to remind myself to have intellectual humility and take my epistemology more seriously before I come to conclusions. I interpret "clean your room" as essentially the idea that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so make sure you have put in the effort to gather sufficient evidence before you trust your perspective".
In a world where truth is being lost in the tidal wave of data availability, where people's confidence in institutions is breaking down because of scandals, where people's trust in authority figures is falling apart due to their perceived failures to be honest with the people, where people are losing their ability to unify around common understandings of reality, where extreme worldviews are being corrupted by cherry-picked data which consequently inspire leftist riots, right-wing insurrections, libertarian kidnapping attempts on governors, and fundamentalist Christian shootings of supposed child sex trafficking rings - a motivation to take epistemology more seriously seems like a desperately needed antidote. If people can learn to clean their psychological room (of bias) and take epistemology seriously before taking part in extremist behavior, perhaps people can see the errors in their worldviews and actually make the world a better place in ways that correspond to more accurate models of reality.
https://youtu.be/NweGsDNBaKc