Evolution Index

Retrovirus evidence alone proves macroevolution, which you have failed to even address or refute. Retroviruses are viruses that inject themselves into the host's DNA, providing evidence of a foreign DNA pattern in the location of injection. The interesting thing about retrovirus evidence is that s

We KNOW that creatures evolved through macroevolution. The evidence is in the DNA. It is crystal clear established fact. Why do you think DNA tests work in criminal court? Why do you think we can trace genetic lineages? We can read DNA like a book and we can find evidence of the evolutionary tree of

https://youtu.be/oXfDF5Ew3Gc This video provides evidence why the probability that evolution is wrong is smaller than a lottery ticket pulled from the number of atoms in the universe (10^82). Just based on one line of evidence alone (retrovirus evidence), there is a 1 in 5.88×10^1418 chance t

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqeYp3nxIYpF7dW7qK8OvLsVomHrnYNjD https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqeYp3nxIYpF7dW7qK8OvLsVomHrnYNjD LECUTURE 3 Tournament species vs pair-bonding species (Tournament species evolve antimother prochild genes) Adelphic polyandry = two brothers rule pack

Abiogenesis is not that hard of a problem. The creationists have partially given up on sending out their anti-evolution propaganda and have moved the goal post to producing anti-abiogenesis propaganda. Don't drink the Kool-Aid. ABIOGENESIS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis Life functions